Ted Lemon writes:
> I hope it was obvious that I was pretty confident that you actually had a
> reason. :)
>
> The issue what what you are saying is that sometimes it is technically
> correct for a name to not be validatable. The reason we want an unsecured
> delegation for .homenet is that .homenet can't be validated using the root
> trust anchor, because the name is has no globally unique meaning. So the
> reason that you've given doesn't apply to this case, although I completely
> agree with your reason as it applies to the case of names that are globally
> unique.
Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something
like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa).
jaap
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
