Ted Lemon writes: > I hope it was obvious that I was pretty confident that you actually had a > reason. :) > > The issue what what you are saying is that sometimes it is technically > correct for a name to not be validatable. The reason we want an unsecured > delegation for .homenet is that .homenet can't be validated using the root > trust anchor, because the name is has no globally unique meaning. So the > reason that you've given doesn't apply to this case, although I completely > agree with your reason as it applies to the case of names that are globally > unique.
Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa). jaap _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop