Ted Lemon writes:

 > I hope it was obvious that I was pretty confident that you actually had a
 > reason.   :)
 > 
 > The issue what what you are saying is that sometimes it is technically
 > correct for a name to not be validatable.   The reason we want an unsecured
 > delegation for .homenet is that .homenet can't be validated using the root
 > trust anchor, because the name is has no globally unique meaning.   So the
 > reason that you've given doesn't apply to this case, although I completely
 > agree with your reason as it applies to the case of names that are globally
 > unique.

Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something
like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa).

        jaap

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to