I don't feel very strongly about renaming the draft. I just find a little bit confusing and I imagine I might not be the only one who might feel that way.
One way or another I have already reviewed -03 versions of the draft and I think it is ready for publication. Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow -------------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.cz https://nic.cz/ -------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- > From: "tjw ietf" <tjw.i...@gmail.com> > To: "dnsop" <dnsop@ietf.org> > Sent: Saturday, 26 November, 2016 01:50:48 > Subject: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any > All > > The authors have addressed all the outstanding issues with this draft, and the > chairs feel this is ready for Working Group Last Call. > > There has been one issue raised which we feel the working group may have some > opinion on this. > > Ondrej Sury raised this point: > > > > > > There's a small procedural thing - the last name of the draft > appears on both datatracker.i.o and tools.i.o. I believe it > would be better to reupload the draft with name changed to > > draft-ietf-dnsop-minimal-any > > to prevent the people who might thing the name of the draft > bears any significance. As this requires almost no effort > I think it would be better to this now than fend of the > questions "why is this refuse-any while it doesn't refuse > ANY" later. > > > The authors and the Chairs support this in principle, but the working group > should comment on this during the WGLC process. > > --------- > This starts a Working Group Last Call for > draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > > [ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any/ | > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any/ ] > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone feels > the > document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with your reasons. > > *Also*, if you have any opinion on changing the document named from > 'refuse-any' > to 'minimal-any', please speak out. > > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on 10 > December, > 2016 > > thanks > tim > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
