Simon,

thanks for all the comments, I have now culled all the context usage from the
draft and the git version should be up to date and ready for -2 upload.

Cheers,
Ondrej

--
 Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
 --------------------------------------------
 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --     Laboratoře CZ.NIC
 Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic
 mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.cz    https://nic.cz/
 --------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Josefsson" <si...@josefsson.org>
> To: "Daniel Migault" <daniel.miga...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: "curdle" <cur...@ietf.org>, "dnsop" <dnsop@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 3 November, 2016 22:01:38
> Subject: Re: [Curdle] WGLC on draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-01

> Daniel Migault <daniel.miga...@ericsson.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
>> draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-01.
>>
>> The version to be reviewed is
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-curdle-dnskey-eddsa-01
> 
> Hello again.  Since my last review of -01, I have re-read the document
> again, and noticed the text regarding signature contexts.  I believe the
> use of contexts is in general ill-advised, and its presence in the
> document highlights a need for a security consideration to address the
> problem that context attempts to mitigate but does not succeed with:
> don't re-use private keys for other purposes.  If this best practice
> advice is followed, contexts is unwanted complexity instead of something
> good.  If a private key is used for other purposes, contexts won't save
> you -- DJB explained this on the CFRG list some time ago in a way that
> convinced me.
> 
> Thus, allow me to suggest that
> 
> 1) The draft is modified to not use signature contexts.
> 
> 2) The security consideration has a new paragraph that reads:
> 
>   A private key used for a DNSSEC zone MUST NOT be used for any other
>   purpose than for that zone.  Otherwise cross-protocol or
>   cross-application attacks are possible.
> 
> Perhaps this text is better suited in the Introduction section, but it
> bears repeating in the security consideration anyway.
> 
> /Simon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Curdle mailing list
> cur...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to