Hi,
I just wanted to tell you that we have published a new version of the
I-D draft-wallstrom-dnsop-dns-delegation-requirements. It fixes all the
comments that we have received so far, both on the mailing list and
during the meeting where it was last discussed:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wallstrom-dnsop-dns-delegation-requirements
One thing that have bugged me was a comment to separate the meanings of
domain names and host names. Host names follow a much more strict set of
rules (they are all referenced in RFC 7719 under "host names") than
domain names that could pretty much contain anything that fit into the
DNS protocol. Right now we reference section 2.1 of RFC1123, but 7719
refers to 3.1 of 1034. Not that much of a difference, but at least worth
mentioning.
In the document we try to follow the rules that if there is something
that is required from the DNS protocol perspective, it's a MUST. If
there is anything needed to have a properly configured DNS that is more
of a recommendation, it is a SHOULD.
Please have a look.
Thanks,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
