On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > >Yup, my view (as can probably be guessed!) is that doing this for > >negative answers is the important bit, and that wildcard synthesis was > >easy to add while we had the hood open (see "shipwright's disease", > >which I suffer from greatly[0]). Seeing as the large majority of the > >discussion has been about the negative answers, I'm going to remove > >the wildcard text. > > > >*Please* WG, let me know if you'd rather that we keep it... > > I'd rather you keep it. > > +1 Keep the positive, rather than writing a separate RFC for that later.
-- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
