Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:17:28AM +0000,
> Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote
> a message of 57 lines which said:
>
> > By the way, is it the case that CNAMEs in the answer section MUST
> > appear in their natural chaining order:
>
> Very good question but, IMHO, it is thread-stealing (hence changing
> the subject, and removing thread headers).
I think there was already a thread on this topic recently on this list
("Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply" from August 2015). There
was some discussion over "adding" versus "appending" and it was pointed
out that a lot of existing code (e.g., the BSD stub resolver) was
written using the "add at the end" meaning.
--
Robert Edmonds
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
