> On 29 Sep 2016, at 13:24, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > >> >> Where’s the demand from experimenters > > The demand? You see it in the use of non-ICANN TLDs like .onion or > .bit. > >> and why do they need a dedicated TLD for their alterate resolution >> systems? > > You may think they don't NEED it but how will you convince them? (The > IETF has no police force, so our only course of action would be to > convince people.) > >> FWIW I’m sceptical about creating .alt as a playpen for experiments >> since it might undermine efforts to answer the question ICANN asked >> us, > > ICANN asked us what? When and where (URL, please)?
Stephane, please stop this rat-holing and whatabootery. [Raising non-sequiturs: what about...] It is not helping the production of a problem statement. I hope you can focus your efforts on that. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
