On 26/09/2016 08:49, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
>> My gut feeling is that RFC 4035 is wrong. But I prefer to ask first: >> how do you read it? > > I think you are right that 4035 is wrong. I think it meant to say > something like: > > Name Error: The node <SNAME, SCLASS> does not exist in the zone either > exactly or via wildcard name expansion. > > where existence is defined in the at time not yet existing RFC 4592 > Section 2.2.3. This came up before. See <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg15809.html> Roy Arend's response was that the intent was that an ENT response requires the same NSEC records as an NXDOMAIN response, but not the same RCODE. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
