Or SRV. These are cases where authoritative/resolver adding interesting records as additionals works better. Authoritatives have been doing that with extra SOA/NS in authority for a while (for positive answers), but now resolvers can hardly use them if these records are not secure.
Regardless of which draft is going to be adopted, it should be explicitly stated which records should client accept. e.g. pushed A+AAAA matching QNAME could be accepted even from insecure zones, but records matching SRV target shouldn't be. Marek On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:57 AM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: >>Are there QTYPEs that, when I ask for them, I won't know that I should >>also ask for the related info? > > NAPTR > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
