On 26/07/2016 16:03, Shane Kerr wrote:
> I think the document itself needs some work (such as more detailed > motivation statement, some use cases, probably getting rid of "terminate > session", and so on). > > At first I thought that this should stay in homenet, but it does use a > lot of DNS jargon which probably makes it best to sit in dnsop, so I > support its adoption. It's actually motivated from DNS-SD and the "push" document there, and not from Homenet at all. The authors have a -02 that we've just been working on, albeit not posted yet while we wait for instructions from the Chairs since the call for adoption is ongoing. That text is in my Github: <https://github.com/raybellis/draft-bellis-dnsop-session-signal> Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
