On 25 July 2016 at 09:37, Ólafur Guðmundsson <ola...@cloudflare.com> wrote:

> This version contains minor text and structure improvements suggested by
> TimW.
>
> Editors think the document is ready for WGLC
>

I'd agree.  A comment though:

I missed this earlier, but in 2. Motivations, third paragraph... between
-00 and -01 the phrase "a DNS operator MAY prefer not to send large ANY
responses" appeared.  Since that modifies the feelings of the operator, not
their actions, is that really an RFC 2119 "MAY"?  I'd suggest either
lower-casing the MAY, or change the sentence to something like:
"If a DNS operator prefers to reduce the potential for information leaks,
they MAY choose not to send large ANY responses."

Grammar nit:
§3, paragraph 4:  "This proposal specifies two different modes of behaviour
by DNS responders, for names that exists." should probably be "This
proposal specifies two different modes of behaviour by DNS responders for
names that exist." (drop the comma and make the tense of the verb agree)




> Olafur
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:38 AM, <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the
>> IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Providing Minimal-Sized Responses to DNS
>> Queries with QTYPE=ANY
>>         Authors         : Joe Abley
>>                           Olafur Gudmundsson
>>                           Marek Majkowski
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-02.txt
>>         Pages           : 9
>>         Date            : 2016-07-21
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    The Domain Name System (DNS) specifies a query type (QTYPE) "ANY".
>>    The operator of an authoritative DNS server might choose not to
>>    respond to such queries for reasons of local policy, motivated by
>>    security, performance or other reasons.
>>
>>    The DNS specification does not include specific guidance for the
>>    behaviour of DNS servers or clients in this situation.  This document
>>    aims to provide such guidance.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any/
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-02
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-02
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to