Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think this is a useful document, but it is not entirely clear to me how well content of this document will age with time. Nits: In section 5: This will increase the likelihood that spit-view unsigned answers are found. Should spit-view be split-view? On page 14: For a stub resolver, problems with the name server MAY manifest themselves as the following types of error conditions: This is not an implementation choice, so use of MAY is not appropriate. Change to "can" or the like. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
