Hi Colleagues,

Regarding the DNS wire-format over HTTP draft, the authors replied and
addressed all comments in the mailing list. The latest update (04) reflect
the comments on simplify the description of HTTP syntax and make the
protocol less tied related to HTTP version

Can I ask for a call for this document (adoption as WG draft )? Any
suggestion is appreciated.

Best regards,
Davey
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
Date: 22 June 2016 at 14:31
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-song-dns-wireformat-http-04.txt
To: "Paul A. Vixie" <vi...@tisf.net>, Shane Kerr <sh...@biigroup.cn>,
Runxia Wan <rx...@biigroup.cn>, Linjian Song <songlinj...@gmail.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-song-dns-wireformat-http-04.txt
has been successfully submitted by Linjian Song and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-song-dns-wireformat-http
Revision:       04
Title:          DNS wire-format over HTTP
Document date:  2016-06-21
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          10
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-song-dns-wireformat-http-04.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-dns-wireformat-http/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-dns-wireformat-http-04
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-song-dns-wireformat-http-04

Abstract:
   This memo introduces a way to tunnel DNS data over HTTP.  This may be
   useful in any situation where DNS is not working properly, such as
   when there is middlebox misbehavior.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to