Dear WG, during the Buenos Aires meeting, the -02 version of "Problem Statement for the Reservation of Top-Level Domains in the Special-Use Domain Names Registry" had been delivered as the result of the design team, with that design team subsequently dissolved. As co-authors, we felt that the comments on readability, clarity and focus had been very constructive, so we had been using the time since to factor these in to streamline the document. We would now like to offer the -03 version as an alternative starting point for the WG. You will see some changes in the co-authors' list, based on availability and text contribution.
Regards, Peter ----- Forwarded message from internet-dra...@ietf.org ----- A new version of I-D, draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Alain Durand and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem Revision: 03 Title: Problem Statement for the Reservation of Top-Level Domains in the Special-Use Domain Names Registry Document date: 2016-05-24 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-03 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-03 Abstract: The dominant protocol for name resolution on the Internet is the Domain Name System (DNS). However, other protocols exist that are fundamentally different from the DNS, and may or may not share the same namespace. When an end-user triggers resolution of a name on a system that supports multiple, different protocols (or resolution mechanisms), it is desirable that the protocol used is unambiguous, and that requests intended for one protocol are not inadvertently answered using another. RFC 6761 introduced a framework by which a particular domain name could be acknowledged as being special. Various challenges have become apparent with this application of the guidance provided in RFC 6761. This document aims to document those challenges in the form of a problem statement in order to facilitate further discussion of potential solutions. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Peter Koch | | p...@denic.de DENIC eG | | +49 69 27235-0 Kaiserstra�e 75-77 | | 60329 Frankfurt am Main | | https://www.DENIC.DE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eingetr. Nr. 770 im Genossenschaftsregister Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main Vorstand: Helga Kr�ger, Martin K�chenthal, Andreas Musielak, Dr. J�rg Schweiger Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Thomas Keller _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
