On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Shane Kerr wrote:
While the QNAME approach does feel a bit like a hack, I have to admit that it probably is slightly better. I can't even think of useful information that having both approaches would add....
Yes, and if you use _trustanchor instead of _ta, you could also use capitalization on each resolver that understood the specialness of this query. So each hop that understands it uppercases one character. So you can tell that _TRustanchor at least got forwarded twice. Not sure how you would signal if the different forwards had different keys though. Might interact badly with 0x20 :) Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
