On 11/04/2016 20:00, Rob Austein wrote:
> Going back at least to the mid '90s, yes. Don't recall whether this > came up in the '80s. :) > > As I recall, the thing that stopped this every time was lack of > consensus on pesky details such as "to which QNAME does the RCODE > apply when this fails" and "to which QNAME does the AA bit apply?" My draft attempts to avoid that by only having one QNAME - the EDNS option just contains a list of extra QTYPEs that should be returned alongside the primary QTYPE from the question. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
