> On Apr 7, 2016, at 10:49 PM, Adrien de Croy <adr...@qbik.com> wrote: > > But it's good to see a clear statement from 1987 about desirability of > supporting alternate protocols (although they use CLASS for that). Maybe > onion should have used a new CLASS :) >
See draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless (which will be discussed in the WG meeting in a few hours) for some analysis of why that’s impractical. Suzanne
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
