> On Mar 30, 2016, at 2:32 PM 3/30/16, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> > wrote: > > Suzanne, > > > On Mar 29, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I’ve always seen people assume that an entry in the special use names >> registry means that ICANN won’t delegate the same string in the DNS root. > > I thought putting a name onto the special use names registries was an > exercise in informing ICANN (and the rest of the world) that the IETF was > invoking clause 4.3(a) of RFC 2860. The last paragraph of 4.3 states: > > "In the event ICANN adopts a policy that prevents it from complying with the > provisions of this Section 4 with respect to the assignments described in (a) > - (c) above, ICANN will notify the IETF, which may then exercise its ability > to cancel this MOU under Section 2 above." > > Are you suggesting you believe ICANN would want to trigger that exercise or > that using the special use registry is not invoking clause 4.3(a) (or > something else)?
David - I've reviewed 4.3(a) and the paragraph you quoted, and I honestly don't see the connection between invoking 4.3(a), the last paragraph of 4.3 and any suggestion on Suzanne's part that ICANN would want to cause the IETF to exercise that option? Would you please explain in a little more detail? - Ralph > > Regards, > -drc > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
