Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 00:16, Stuart Cheshire <chesh...@apple.com> wrote: > >> On 21 Mar 2016, at 20:02, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: >> >> Our document is in AUTH48 already, so making those kind of changed there >> might be very difficult. > > I didn’t realise that. I agree, it’s too late to make substantive changes at > this point. > >> Also, if you are so idle that you might run into tcp issues timing out, you >> probably should be nice to the other end and close your tcp session. > > The idea of DNS Push Notifications is for moderately long-standing queries > (on the order of 5-10 minutes) waiting to be notified of some change. > > For example, you go to print, but the printer is turned off. You walk down > the hall and turn the printer on, and when you get back to your office your > computer has been notified that a new printer has become available (without > you having to repeatedly cancel and try again until the printer shows up). > Sound more like a match for xmpp than DNS? Paul > It’s not something that would be useful for all DNS servers. Think of it as a > different protocol, that happens to leverage existing DNS protocols and > message formats instead of inventing new protocols and message formats. > > The draft explains it in more detail. > > DNSOP feedback on the draft would be appreciated. > > Stuart Cheshire > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
