Suzanne, On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's an argument to be made that "People considered carefully and don't > believe any amount of tinkering will make an idea that depends on CLASS > workable, so the option isn't available" will result in shorter conversations > about those ideas.
I love your optimism, however I am skeptical that closing the registry will have the desired effect. I suspect a more likely outcome is that the conversations will instead get longer as they become heated as to whether or not the registry should be reopened. I suspect a better answer for the desired effect you are hoping for by closing the registry would be an RFC that says "Classes Are Not The Droids You're Looking For" that would allow "DNS experts" to simply point to that document whenever someone suggests classes are a solution to any particular problem. And no, I'm not offering to write said document :) Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
