>> As an implementation note, doing this only on a cache miss sounds to >> me like a reasonable choice. > >Reasonable for the "traffic intensity and protection against random >QNAME attacks", yes. But still inelegant (it violates the tree model >of domain names).
I'm confused. If the query finds an entry in the cache, why wouldn't it use it? R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
