On 02/12/2016 01:48 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem/ >
Hello, This ID seems to require the definition of a new registry, and Section 6 to suggest how this would be used. I think this goes way beyond what needs to be done in order to revise RFC6761. Another registry (for protocol switch) is not solving anything. Instead, whether the TLD operates a protocol switch can be documented in the existing registry: creating a new registry for this would only sidetrack the problem of registering new Special-Use Domain Names without solving any issue with RFC 6761. * Editorial notes: In section 3, the term "impact" is used abusively to replace the original "considerations". Considerations are welcome, impact should be avoided. "[Answers to these seven questions] are inadequate for making the determination whether a particular domain name qualifies as being special in the first place." -> This statement should be followed by a demonstration how this situation is factual, otherwise it's irrelevant. Section 4 has a typo: "are par of" should read "are part of". Section 4 may mention NSSwitch? Section 4 has a typo: "we are actually building a catalog of all top level domains that explain which are are switches." -> should read "that explains". "... has been discussed (.ALT)." -> Requires reference. Note: .ALT does *not* apply generally, but only to those "alternate domains" that *do not require global uniqueness* of names. Therefore "If that architecture choice is made, some of the questions listed in the sections bellow would become moot." is moot. Section 5: "In the case of [I-D.ietf-dnsop-onion-tld], leakage" -> Update reference to RFC 7686. (Also in Section 6.2.1) Section 6.2.2: "For example, is large scale prior deployment an acceptable criteria?" -> This is a bad example, as lengthy discussions about it illustrate in the case of a peer-to-peer network where "large scale deployment", besides being entirely subjective, is also non-measurable. Thanks for the "Pithy Quotes from History" :) Regards, == hk _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
