> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > Doing anything more determinate would require an extra loop over the data > to choose, before the loop that builds the response. (Actually I can > probably avoid two loops if I'm clever.) I didn't think I cared enough to > do that. However some answers from my zones (e.g. DNSKEY) are bigger than > 512 bytes and so can cause truncation and TCP, so maybe I do care after > all.
Or just having the TCP implementation in BIND get improved as it’s clear there are some more people pushing in this direction. I’m looking at just putting something like DNSDIST on my hosts to process TCP and balance it across multiple daemons to do the query scale. - Jared _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
