On 14 Jan 2016, at 10:25, Bob Harold wrote:
Section 1 says
[RFC1034] describes
that configuration as a list of servers that will authoritative
answers to queries about the root.
s/that will authoritative answers to/that will give authoritative
answers to/
(or "that will authoritatively answer")
Good catch; fixed.
Section 3 says
The RD bit MAY be set to 0 or 1, although the meaning of it being set
to 1 is undefined for priming queries.
But a priming query is just a normal DNS query, so RD would be defined
normally, no?
It would be defined normally, yes. Section 4.1 says that a priming query
should come back with an authoritative answer. Setting the RD bit to 1
could result in non-authoritative answers.
How does the WG feel about this? If the response to a priming query is
non-authoritative, should the resolver reject it and try more queries?
Or is it OK for a priming response to be non-authoritative?
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
