Robert Edmonds wrote: > There is an analogous case with compression pointers themselves, which > 1035 requires point to a "prior occurance [sic] of the same name". But > BIND allowed pointers to point to later occurrences, and later > implementations had to make the same allowance for compatibility > reasons.
Maybe such allowances had to be made at one point, but they are not needed today. BIND 9 has been rejecting compression pointers to "later occurrences" for 15 years now, so any implementation sending them has surely been weeded out by now. -- Andreas Gustafsson, g...@araneus.fi _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
