> On 6 Jan 2016, at 07:57, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
> 
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-04: No Objection
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -- Section 1 --
> 
>   Long-lived
>   TCP connections can result in lower request latency than the case
>   where UDP transport is used and truncated responses are received,
>   since clients that have fallen back to TCP transport in response to a
>   truncated response typically only uses the TCP session for a single
>   (request, response) pair, continuing with UDP transport for
>   subsequent queries.
> 
> This is a really long, awkward sentence, and it appears to have an error
> 
> in it that makes it unparseable.  

Point taken. I have re-worded it to make it clearer. 

>  But the use
> in 
> the abstract and at the top of page 4 are not.  I suggest "clients 
> commonly use TCP only for retries" in the abstract, and "received over
> UDP 
> with retries over TCP" on page 4.
> 

Yes, I think this is clearer. I have updated as suggested. 

Changes are in the -05 version published this morning. 

Regards

Sara. 

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to