> On 6 Jan 2016, at 07:57, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-04: No Objection > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- Section 1 -- > > Long-lived > TCP connections can result in lower request latency than the case > where UDP transport is used and truncated responses are received, > since clients that have fallen back to TCP transport in response to a > truncated response typically only uses the TCP session for a single > (request, response) pair, continuing with UDP transport for > subsequent queries. > > This is a really long, awkward sentence, and it appears to have an error > > in it that makes it unparseable.
Point taken. I have re-worded it to make it clearer. > But the use > in > the abstract and at the top of page 4 are not. I suggest "clients > commonly use TCP only for retries" in the abstract, and "received over > UDP > with retries over TCP" on page 4. > Yes, I think this is clearer. I have updated as suggested. Changes are in the -05 version published this morning. Regards Sara. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
