Shane Kerr wrote:
> I have updated the DNS over HTTP review document that I sent some days
> ago. Thanks to Jinmei for reading it.
>
> As I mentioned before, if there is interest then my co-authors and I
> are happy to try to get the working group to adopt the document. If
> there is not interest, then we are happy to go forward with an
> individual submission.
>
> If I don't hear any positive support over the next week or two then
> that is a pretty clear sign that the working group has little
> interest. :)
Hi, Shane:
Given BCP 188 ("Pervasive Monitoring Is a Widespread Attack on Privacy"
and "The IETF Will Work to Mitigate Pervasive Monitoring"), I'm a bit
disappointed that "HTTPS" is spelled "HTTP(S)" in your document :-) If
you're going to go to the trouble of defining a new transport for DNS,
what's the rationale for allowing the transport to permit plaintext?
--
Robert Edmonds
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
