As one of the authors of the base CDS document, I think this should be adopted. We actually had the "delete" option in an earlier version of CDS, but removed it at the WGs request.
W On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:09 AM Matthijs Mekking <matth...@pletterpet.nl> wrote: > On 28-11-15 14:22, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > > There was a lot of positive support for this draft in Yokohama, so this > > is considered > > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds > > > > The draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ogud-dnsop-maintain-ds/ > > > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > I consider these to be valuable features. Building further on CDS makes > a whole lot of sense to me. So I definitely think this document should > be adopted by the working group. > > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > I am willing. > > Best regards, > Matthijs > > > This call for adoption ends 12 December 2015. > > > > Thanks, > > tim wicinski > > DNSOP co-chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
