Some feedback with respect to installed trust anchors is needed.
Whether this is the correct solution I'm not sure. It requires
updating all resolvers in the resolution path to both cache and
relay tags. The same can be achieved by encoding the tags into
qnames/qtypes without needing the entire ecosystem to be upgraded
which this proposal requires.
e.g.
_ta_<base32-tag-sequence>.<trustanchor>/NULL
Mark
In message <5659a1db.5090...@gmail.com>, Tim Wicinski writes:
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wessels-edns-key-tag
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wessels-edns-key-tag/
>
> There was unanimous support this during the meeting in Yokohama, so this
> is more of a formality, unless we hear strong negative reaction.
>
> However, please indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> Since there was unanimous support for this draft, I am going with a one
> week Call for Adoption. Please feel free to protest if anyone feels this
> is out of line.
>
> This call for adoption ends 7 December 2015.
>
> Thanks,
> tim wicinski
> DNSOP co-chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
