> On Nov 22, 2015, at 9:03 AM 11/22/15, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> > wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:08:42PM +0100, > Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org> wrote > a message of 13 lines which said: > >> We have solicited but failed to receive any feedback from the dnsop >> chairs or list on how to improve/revise the draft. Hence, there are >> currently no updates. I continue to await the chairs asking for >> last call on this. > > It has been said that post-onion drafts won't be considered until > 6761bis is out <https://www.ietf.org/blog/2015/09/onion/> but it did > not prevented > <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/> to > advance: it will be interesting to see how .home is handled.
In what way has draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home advanced? I see that a new revision has been published with minor editorial changes, but it still appears to be an individual submission that has not been adopted by any WG. - Ralph > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
