Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The authors have updated their document to address all outstanding > issues, and we feel the document is ready for Working Group Last Call.
The rationale for this document is still completely wrong. It does not provide any reduction in latency compared to the existing DNS protocol. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Biscay, Southeast Fitzroy: Southwesterly 5 or 6 in far north, otherwise variable 3 or 4. Moderate or rough. Fair. Good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
