On 05/11/2015 10:11, George Michaelson wrote: > So can somebody explain to me what we are meant to do with a possible > emerging homenet desire for .home? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/
This particular proposal was being discussed long before any of the .onion et al proposals existed, but didn't get put into draft form until slightly after. > because I believe this isn't just the tail of odd requests from the tor > people for various hash based names.. its another WG inside the IETF > process thinking "oh.. .onion worked, so lets go do one" Without my Homenet co-chair hat on, but as an interested party, my view is that I'd like to see ".home" formally blocked from registration as a new TLD [*] by putting it into the "locally served zones" list, and perhaps sunk to AS112 to catch those queries that aren't caught via locally served zones. Ray [*] AFAICR, ICANN have said that's their plan, but it's also the case that ICANN plans and policies can change. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
