On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > Hi all, > > I couldn't quite interpret the questions and hums in the room; was the > consensus > > (a) this clarification is not needed; the existing spec is clear enough, or > > (b) a clarification might be useful, but the proposed clarification in the > document is wrong, or > > (c) something else? > > If it's (b), I could collect more of the kinds of insights that were > provided at the mic and update the proposal. > > If it's (a), I can happily just shut up about and move on with other things > :-)
I believe that in theory the result of the hum was (a) but it may be that many people thought (b)... Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e...@gmail.com > Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
