On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I couldn't quite interpret the questions and hums in the room; was the
> consensus
>
> (a) this clarification is not needed; the existing spec is clear enough, or
>
> (b) a clarification might be useful, but the proposed clarification in the
> document is wrong, or
>
> (c) something else?
>
> If it's (b), I could collect more of the kinds of insights that were
> provided at the mic and update the proposal.
>
> If it's (a), I can happily just shut up about and move on with other things
> :-)

I believe that in theory the result of the hum was (a) but it may be
that many people thought (b)...

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e...@gmail.com

> Joe

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to