-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Joe,

I have reviewed the document, and I support it.

section 1. s/complimentary/complementary/
section 4.3.  Unbound's implementation currently only accepts trust
anchors after the validFrom has passed and not during
add-hold-down-time before.  I think it is harmless to accept
not-yet-valid keys some time in advance, so I think the text is fine,
but I am unsure if I should adjust my implementation.

Best regards, Wouter

On 31/10/15 23:18, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> Joe,
> 
> Thanks for the update.
> 
> Those of you who supported publication— I assume Joe will be
> reminding you to review :-)
> 
> 
> best, Suzanne
> 
>> On Oct 31, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just a clarification to the wg, since I think my earlier note on
>> this was buried in some long thread -- the authors of
>> draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor have taken it to the ISE and it
>> has been accepted as a draft on the independent stream.
>> 
>> The next step in the process is for some people to review it.
>> Please feel free to do that and send your opinions to
>> rfc-...@rfc-editor.org, ideally cc'ing the authors (directly or
>> via this list) so that we know what is happening.
>> 
>> If there are changes proposed as part of the review we will
>> follow up with edits and submit them, per the usual process.
>> 
>> Thanks all,
>> 
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing
>> list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list 
> DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWOJroAAoJEJ9vHC1+BF+NVO0P/2CdXDFq+R5mkYutQ7teJJrS
tASghCtEySAjFk6CL8v3g3gX2Uio8Q+m48KetLUha9GbmrSFoQg3bHeFrREzJrtN
SDMVfayI8mmkO//uTeY7kJ5ivgt+vVpbLi154ZxD3Qj1Xtnaykbc2cNYleu3mqWP
Zz0aCPZTYfIkzOI3ywa6euGT20pJYERfuB6x7/pp5LPQJTVRgQ/ZmoninTknRbAF
XmOSOsSAVCsr2c3iV6WpkMpA0EkoBwbvsqpfElKq2DtAtnfcY9Wow7xXa+t7UIar
4jjw0R1aCqBVi7dyAGgcqhszy4s0qIhOwUePbS3BUN6IJVJ4ZNluRis6Mm9IzDVn
WR0l7x/8KZPLD9loDoHxrlqCeWkZG1YikRjP8WKLnAnwuMt2Mewdyk/PBNnkfiSp
M4Txk4IeLUQoNIPSsLsxUNU54UcOHQYDC7C4oL0C2rtE9+pxotFafbBQyrV+7dtd
hQBvgLWuturK8c6XcD1x2APV0WtOyvg06bI3X8uMqiY9Xo9z3id13+5INSbIdUHf
xOMI7lcO81GvpSLMsO+MqlhDQMg4DabwhLc2fTSFEbiPNEFJYVlZuKWi2/bR61rr
Xz41AcAtLyvdXnKCs5M/o9DmyRywA606/XamqbqrAZTQxIdyQzH5SviFJ24MZmW1
GO8L8IyU8czDVnztIXUg
=ab3f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to