Niall O'Reilly wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:20:50 +0100, > Tony Finch wrote: >> The first-last convention has the minor advantage of accommodating >> non-CIDR delegations > > or perversely-fragmented CIDR ones such as /26, 2x/26, /26, with > a single organization responsible for the middle pair of /26, > and otherwise no common responsibility. 8-)
in the deep prehistory of rfc 2317, i wanted cidr style naming conventions, geertjan wanted range style, and geertjan was right. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
