On 13 Oct 2015, at 13:30, Bob Harold wrote:

> In general, the draft looks good to me.  Minor changes suggested:
>
> Section 4 includes:
> "1.  A DNS responder may choose to search for an owner name that matches
> the QNAME and, if that name owns multiple RRs, return just one of them."
>
> I think "RRs" should be "RRSets", as in section 5.
>
> Section 5:
> "mulitple" -> "multiple"

Thanks for the review, fixed for the next rev.


Joe

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to