On 13 Oct 2015, at 13:30, Bob Harold wrote:
> In general, the draft looks good to me. Minor changes suggested: > > Section 4 includes: > "1. A DNS responder may choose to search for an owner name that matches > the QNAME and, if that name owns multiple RRs, return just one of them." > > I think "RRs" should be "RRSets", as in section 5. > > Section 5: > "mulitple" -> "multiple" Thanks for the review, fixed for the next rev. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop