> On 12 Oct 2015, at 13:36, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:09:38PM +0100, > sara <s...@sinodun.com> wrote > a message of 107 lines which said: > >> So under normal circumstances matching on just the Message ID should >> be sufficient for TCP, which was the reason the QCLASS+QNAME+QTYPE >> part was removed when changing the ‘must' here to ‘MUST' in the last >> revision of this draft. > > OK, but why adding the port number, useless for TCP?
It was meant to restrict the matching to messages on a single TCP connection, but it clearly just caused confusion. I think Tony’s suggested text works well. Sara. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
