On 16 Sep 2015, at 20:22, Terry Manderson wrote:
No-objection from me regarding the existence of this document, I do
think
it's helpful, however along with others (Ben, Benoit, Alvaro) I feel
the
work is incomplete if a revision is required so soon.
We hope our wording explains this, without setting any expectations on
"so soon".
I would feel much more comfortable if the document was taken back to
the
WG and completed before being published.
Had the ex-DNSEXT WG noticed ten years ago that people's views of the
definitions were diverging, that would have been grand. With another
decade of heel digging-in, completion of the updates might be much
harder.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
