Hi George! On 18 Sep 2015, at 12:58, George Michaelson wrote:
> Ed wrote a draft whose purpose claimed to be definitional around what > domain names are. In that context I replied. If you don't really care how > we use words, thats fine too. I don't think that's a reasonable summary of what I care about, for the record :-) I understand the context. I was really talking to a wider context, which is the difficulty with words we're used to seeing in the DNS when they are used in other name resolution protocols -- I was trying to suggest that the wider context has more to do with the use of multiple naming systems than it does with the overloading of individual terms. > I agree it won't alter anything and I want to stop here, since I suspect > I'm already well on the way to hitting peoples kill file. I don't have a kill file, George, but if I did the world would be a gloomier and more tedious place with you in it. Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
