At Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:08:00 -0400, Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi - The dnssd chairs would like to get some reviews of > > draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01, "On Interoperation of Labels > > Between mDNS and DNS," from dnsop participants. > > draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-01 is currently in dnssd WG last > > call and last call comments will be discussed in the dnssd WG > > meeting this week. > > > > Please post your feedback to dnsop or send to Tim and myself. I've read the draft. Although I'm not really familiar with IDNA (readers are supposed to be familiar with it according to Section 1.1), I think it's generally well written and useful. One feedback as a non-familiar reader that might be useful is that it would be more helpful if this document provides some specific examples that are and are not compliant with the proposed profile. And, I noticed one very minor editorial issue: in the first paragraph of Section 3: Any interoperability between DNS (including prevailing operational conventions and other resolution technologies will require interoperability across the portions of a DNS-SD Service Instance Name that are implicated in regular DNS lookups. The parenthesis is not closed. I guess there should be a closing parenthesis after "conventions". -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
