Thanks Kevin, you mean in the server side we should suggest DNSoverHTTP 
operators  to adopt a filter to block the proxy which anonymize the source IP 
of DNS query. It is not related to DNSoverHTTP protocol but security 
consideration, right? 

Davey

> 在 2015年8月6日,01:02,Darcy Kevin (FCA) <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com> 写道:
> 
> Add yet another category of websites to block in corporate web proxies: DNS 
> query anonymizers.
>  
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>     - Kevin
>  
> From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Davey Song
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 9:47 PM
> To: dnsop@ietf.org
> Subject: [DNSOP] About DNS over HTTP(s)
>  
> Hi folks,
>  
> As one of my own observation, there is a trend of using port http(s) for DNS 
> transaction to provide better DNS service regarding DNS Hijacking issue, 
> middle-box issue, DNS privacy and IP Geolocation consideration. As a typical 
> scenario and requirement, end users will benefit from the capability always 
> choosing the reliable and credible recursive server no matter where they are. 
> In addition, Ads providers can alleviate their suffering  from DNS Hijacking 
> by malware and network devices, which is a common Internet misbehavior 
> nowadays. I heard the constant complaining from local Ads providers like 
> Taobao and Baidu.
>  
> There are some related work already done from the industry, for example:
> 1) DNSpod serves DNS over HTTP service called ‘D+’ to help their clients get 
> avoid DNS hijacking, with lower RRT. This service is used by Tencent to 
> identify clients’ ISP accurately. (https://www.dnspod.cn/httpdns 
> <https://www.dnspod.cn/httpdns>  only in Chinese)
> 2) DNSSEC trigger uses DNS over HTTP as a back-up for DNSSEC validation 
> failure (https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/dnssec-trigger/ 
> <https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/dnssec-trigger/>)
> 3) Restful DNS API (DNS in Json ) allows to perform DNS queries over HTTP  in 
> Json format.  (http://www.dns-lg.com/ <http://www.dns-lg.com/>) Also, 
> PowerDNS supports DNS queries over HTTP in Json format by a 
> “experimental-json-interface=yes” config.( 
> https://doc.powerdns.com/md/httpapi/README/ 
> <https://doc.powerdns.com/md/httpapi/README/>)
> 4) DNSoverHTTP using proxies as a quick deployment tool which encapsulates 
> DNS package into HTTP connections. These proxies are implemented both in 
> C(https://github.com/BII-Lab/DNSoverHTTP 
> <https://github.com/BII-Lab/DNSoverHTTP>/) and 
> golang(https://github.com/BII-Lab/DNSoverHTTPinGO 
> <https://github.com/BII-Lab/DNSoverHTTPinGO>/)
> There are maybe other variations in different . Due to there is no specific 
> standard about DNS over HTTP(s), implementations vary without 
> interoperability with each other. Some implementations can not fully support 
> all DNS records. As far as I know, there is no document to address that 
> issue.  So I’m considering if there is any worth to document the current 
> practice of DNS over http(s) with suggestions to implementation and 
> operation. If necessary we can also defined/assign some parameters for DNS 
> over HTTP(s) in the scope of W3C or IANA
> So an intuitive thinking is that we can unify some parameters of HTTP 
> protocol for DNS application. Here is a list of parameters which might need 
> to be unify as my own concern:
> 1.      Resource name: To distinguish DNS over HTTP with normal HTTP request, 
> there should be a unique resource name for DNS over HTTP (there are cases Web 
> and DNS services  are hosted in a same server ). For example, in our proxy 
> implementation we use “proxy-dns” as resource name to differentiate from 
> other webpage resources 
> 2.      Content type: To avoid DNS over HTTP request be processed by 
> unsupported server mistakenly. DNS over HTTP may use a unique sub content 
> type under content type application. 
> 3.      Return code:(I’m not very sure whether this parameter is necessary) 
> To indicate client the errors, DNS over HTTP may have a set of return 
> code(error code). 
> 4.      Post/Get: The server’s behavior to Post and Get method should be 
> specified. A easy thinking is that the server might return the description of 
> DNS over HTTP when client use Get method while provide DNS over HTTP service 
> when client use Post method.
> 5.      Other parameter : There might be some parameters need be added in DNS 
> over HTTP’s header, such as Host IP, UDP/TCP (http-proxy usage), 
> Json/Octet-stream etc . 
>  
> Any suggestion please comment.
>  
> Best regards,
> Davey
>  
>  
> ------------------------------
> Davey Song(宋林健)
> BII Lab
> songlinj...@gmail.com <mailto:songlinj...@gmail.com>
>  

------------------------------
Davey Song(宋林健)
BII Lab
songlinj...@gmail.com


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to