Ray Bellis wrote: > > Mostly because IMHO it would be a darned sight simpler (and more future > proof) not to have to look up from a per-value table whether any > particular option should be forwarded or dropped. > > I'm thinking in particular of things with embedded firmware that don't > routinely get updates.
for those reasons, end-to-end forwarding will not be reliable. if we want to send something end-to-end we have to put it into the answer section, and sign it. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
