On 07/17/2015 12:17 PM, Eliot Lear wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote: >>> I have no particular objection to the concept here, but I do have a >>> question about one sentence in the draft. Section 1 states: >>>> Like Top-Level Domain Names, .onion addresses can have an arbitrary >>>> number of subdomain components. This information is not meaningful >>>> to the Tor protocol, but can be used in application protocols like >>>> HTTP [RFC7230]. >>>> > > I just leave the IESG and WG with the comment that two of us "old > timers" are trying to divine the meaning of those two sentences, and > that can't be good for others with (even) less clue. Personally I think > the easiest approach is to remove those two sentences, but if others > really disagree, then a bit more clarity seems in order. > *** Removing the sentences sounds fine to me: they're not relevant to the name registration itself.
== hk _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
