Hi all, A number of people approached me at DNS-OARC and the RIPE DNS track in Amsterdam asking what became of this draft, and could we please update it. Wes and I finally had some time to work on it in Buenos Aires, after the ICANN meeting (actually, Wes did the work, I just mumbled and brought him coffee...)
We are, as always, eager for feedback. W ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org> Date: Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:26 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses-01.txt To: Wesley Hardaker <i...@hardakers.net>, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net>, Zhiwei Yan <yanzhi...@cnnic.cn> A new version of I-D, draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Wes Hardaker and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses Revision: 01 Title: Returning multiple answers in DNS responses. Document date: 2015-07-06 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses-01 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses-01 Abstract: This document (re)introduces the ability to provide multiple answers in a DNS response. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
