On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All > > Donald and Mark have worked out the issues on the DNS Cookies draft, > mostly around the issue of returning an error code (no), and getting an > official Option-Code (10). > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies/ > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-04 > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone > feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with > your reasons. > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on > Thursday July 16th, 2015. > > thanks > tim > > > Looks good to me. I like the concept. Two minor spelling errors: Page 11, Section 5, last sentence of first paragraph: "Rollover of the client and server secrets and transient retention of the old coookie" "coookie" should be "cookie" Page 16, Section 6, first sentence "In the Classic Internet, DNS Cookies could simply be a pseudo-random function of the client IP address and a sever secret" "sever" should be "server" -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
