registering something in a registry does not prevent someone from using it. it suggests that there is already a use for the string. it does not matter if that is an IANA registry or the registry that is the DNS. There are -LOTS- of registries for strings. A classic case was Bell Northern Research and Burlington Northern Railroad. Bell registered BNR.com and was challanged (successfully) by Burlington over the domain name, since the railroad predated the telecom lab.
Will the Special Names Registry be used for legal challenges? manning bmann...@karoshi.com PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 7May2015Thursday, at 7:15, Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Livingood, Jason > <jason_living...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > On 5/6/15, 2:07 PM, "Suzanne Woolf" <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > c) The requests we're seeing for .onion and the other p2p names > already in use are arguing that they should get their names to enable their > technologies with minimal disruption to their installed base. While the > requesters may well have valid need for the names to be recognized, there is > still a future risk of name collision or other ambiguity. The IETF is being > asked to recognize the pre-existing use of these names. Does this scale to > future requests? > > Beyond that, does it end up being a cheap way to avoid the ICANN process of > creating a new gTLD. For example, I am not aware that anything prevents the > ToR project from applying to ICANN for the .onion gTLD. So from one > perspective, would more people just deploy into an unused namespace and then > later lay claim the the namespace retroactively based on their use > (gTLD-squatting)? This could be quite messy at scale, and I am not sure the > IETF has a process to deal with and consider competing uses. > > > Registering .onion would prevent others from using it. But the other thing > that they really want is for .onion names to never to be sent to DNS, for > privacy reasons, and registering the name does not solve that. In a sense > the special-use registry is the opposite of registering a domain name - it > says this name should never be sent to DNS. > > -- > Bob Harold > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
