Since I already said I was ok with the addition, can we just stipulate that I'm 
wrong and move along with it?   

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums. 

> On May 6, 2015, at 17:06, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote:
> 
> I have never heard of ARPA being treated as a subclass of gTLD.
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 
>> On May 4, 2015, at 4:48 AM, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:45:09AM +0000, Edward Lewis wrote:
>>> ccTLD and gTLD, but those are examples.  ("into ccTLDs, gTLDs, and other
>>> categories;")[0]
>> 
>> I'm not opposed to the "and other categories", but the truth is that
>> anyone who cares about DNS never hears about those other categories.
>> Even around ICANN policy discussions everything that isn't a ccTLD is
>> treated as a subclass of gTLD.
>> 
>> A
>> 
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> a...@anvilwalrusden.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to