At Fri, 1 May 2015 23:21:30 +0000, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote: > The chief difference between the two is the presence of an error code field > in Eastlake cookies; Andrews found it redundant/unnecessary (as discussed > in https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13984.html). > The hope was that including both mechanisms in the draft would lead to > a working group discussion about whether the error code is, in fact, > necessary or desirable; unfortunately, not much discussion has happened > yet.
Can someone explain why we'd need the separate error codes based on the position of supporting them (i.e, not to persuade others on dropping them)? msg13984.html was basically written to argue against them, so it could potentially and unintentionally be biased. I'll try to find any such explanation myself, but if someone already knows it better can do that, it would also help. -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
