Hi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:10:53PM -0400, Bob Harold wrote: > > Stealth server -- This is the same as a slave server except that it > is not listed in an NS resource record for the zone. (Quoted from > [RFC1996], section 2.1) A stealth server is often actually a master > for zone transfers, and in that case is called a "hidden master". > > > A Stealth server is often a primary master, which I believe is *not* "the > same as a slave server", but rather a separate case. A Stealth server can > be master or slave.
I know people use it that way, but the definition in RFC1996 is what it is and we mostly try to cleave to that. I think what you're talking about is exactly the "hidden master" in the text already, no? > in a response. For example, the server for the parent zone > example.com might reply with glue records for ns.child.example.com. > Because the child.example.com zone is a descendant of the example.com > zone, both glue records are in-bailiwick. > > > In the last sentence "both" seems out of place, I think "the" would be > better. Good catch, thanks. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
