In message <alpine.lsu.2.00.1504012227030.13...@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>, Tony F
inch writes:
> Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote:
> > John Levine wrote:
> > >
> > > A very short survey reveals that unbound and 8.8.8.8 return SOA, bind
> > > doesn't.  So it's not all the time, but it's pretty common.
> >
> > in BIND it's an option.
> 
> It is? I can't work out how to make it produce a negative response without
> a SOA. minimal-responses doesn't do it.

I suspect that the tested name had a bad soa record from the
authoritative servers.  Named is much more picky about soa records
it receives than most nameservers.

> Tony.
> -- 
> f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
> Portland, Plymouth, North Biscay: Westerly 5 to 7, decreasing 4 later.
> Moderate or rough. Occasional rain or drizzle. Good becoming moderate or poor
> .
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to